Por qué no existe un instrumento de medición de la responsabilidad social corporativa único, globalmente aceptado?
Issue | Vol. 37 Núm. 4 (2012): Ciencia y Sociedad |
DOI | |
Publicado | dic 1, 2012 |
Estadísticas |
Resumen
En las últimas décadas el mundo de los negocios internacionales ha experimentado un interés cada vez más creciente sobre el tema de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa (RSC), a pesar de que este tema ha estado bajo el escrutinio de la academia por más de sesenta años, aun no se logra consenso en puntos tan fundamentales como la definición del concepto mismo. De igual modo, con el transcurrir del tiempo distintos autores han introducido nuevos términos, para referirse al mismo concepto, muchas veces utilizándolos indistintamente. Conjuntamente con la proliferación de definiciones y términos han surgido distintos mecanismos para medir la RSC lo que ha dificultado la comparabilidad entre los indicadores alcanzados por unas empresas y otras, y entre las empresas de uno u otro país. El siguiente artículo tiene como objetivo revisar la literatura sobre el tema de los instrumentos de medición de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa e identificar las causas por las cuales no existe un único instrumento de medición globalmente aceptado.
Carroll, A. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, July-August, 30-48.
Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. DOLIO.1177/ 000765039903800303.
Cetindamar, D., Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 163-176.
Chien-Ming, C., & Delmas, M. (2011). Measuring Corporate Social Performance: An Efficiency Perspective. Production and Operations Management, 20(6), 789-804. DOI:I0.1111/j.l937- 5956.2010.01202.x.
Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. DOI:I0.I002/csr.
Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., Yang, Y. (2010). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Recuperado de SSRN: http://ssm.com/abstract= 1687155 o http://dx.doi.org /10.2139/ssm.l687155.
Frederick, W. C. (1978). From CSRl to CSR2: The Maturing of Business- and-Society thought. Working paper. Katz Gradúate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Frederick, W. C. (1987). Theories of Corporate Social Performance. In Sethi, S.P. and Falbe, C. (eds), Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation. New York: Lexington Books. 142-161.
Frederick, W. C. (1994). Classic Paper: from CSR1 Business and Society, 33, 150164.
Gilí, A. (2008). Corporate Govemance as Social Responsibility: A Research Agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26 Berkeley J. Inñ L. 26(2), 452-478.
Hammond, K., & Miles, S. (2004). AssessingQuality Assessment of Corporate Social Reporting: UK perspectives Accounting Forum, 28(1), 61-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.04.005.
Hess, D. A. Framework or CSR Assessment, Measurement And Reporting. Recuperado de: http://www.stthomas.edu/cathstudies/cst/conferences/thegoodcompany/FinalpaperslFIess20Fin al20Paper.pdf.
Hopkins, M. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: an Issues Paper. World Cornmission on the Social Dimensión of Globalization International Labour Office. ISBN 92-2-116138-2 (printed versión) ISBN 92-2-116139-0 (web versión).
Maon F., Swaen V., & Lindgreen, A. s.f., “Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: A Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice ” Journal of Business Ethics. Recuperado de: http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/iag / documents/WP 22 Maon Swaen Lindgreen.pdf.
Metcalf, C. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility as Global Public Law: Third Party Rankings as Regulation by Information Corporate Social Responsibility as Global. Pace Environmental Law Revieiv, 28(1).
Morimoto, R., Ash, J., & Hope, C. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice Audit: From Theory to Practice. Judge Institute of Management. Recuperado de: http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm Pabstract id=670 144.
Q'Connor, M., & Spangenberg, J. (2008). A methodology for CSR reporting: assuming a representative diversity of indicators across stakeholders, scales, sites and performance issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(13), 1399-1415. DOLIO.1016/ j.jclepro.2007.08.005.
Rahim, M. (2011). Meta-regulation Approach of Law: A Potential Legal Strategy to Develop Socially Responsible Business Self- regulation in Least Developed Common Law Countries. Cornmon Law World Review, 40(2), 174-206.
Rahman, S. (2011). World Review of Business Research Evaluation of Definitions: Ten Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility Rahman. World Review of Business Research, 1(1), 166—176.
Sahoo, C., Freeman, R., & Liedtka, J. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: Issues and Controversies. Journal of Business and Management, 1905, 1-5.
Sehic, D., & Sabanovic, J. (2008, mayo 16-17). Corporate Social Responsibility of B & H Companies in Globalization. 5th International Scientific Conference Business and Management’ 2008, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Shamir, R. (2011). Socially Responsible Prívate Regulation: World- Culture or World Capitalism? Law & Society Review, 45, 313-336. DOI: 10.1111 / j.l 540-5893.2011.00439.x.^
Sorsa, V. (2008). How to Explain Socially Responsible Corporate Actions Institutionally: Theoretical and Methodological Critique. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 13,32-41.
Thomas, G., & Nowak, M. (2006). GSB Working Paper N.° 62 Corporate Social Responsibility: A definition. Curtin University of Technology Working Paper Series. (62), 1-20.
Vogel, D. (2005). The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social responsibility. Brookings Institute Press: Washington, DC ISBN 0-8157-9076-7.
Wartick, S. L. & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
Weber, M. (2008). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Company-level Measurement Approach for CSR. European Management Journal' 26(4), 247-261. DOLIO.1016/ j.emj.2008.01.006.
Wood, D. (2010). Measuring Corporate Social Performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 274. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1468- 2370.2009.00274.x.
- Resumen visto - 215 veces
- PDF descargado - 125 veces
- HTML descargado - 51 veces
Descargas
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Copyright
© Ciencia y Sociedad, 2017
Afiliaciones
Teresa Longobardi
Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC)