Azumi, K. and McMillan, c J. (1981): Management strategy and organizaron estructure: A japanese comparative study. In: Hickson, d. J. and McMillan, C. J. (eds.), Organization and Nation: The Aston progrumme IV, pp. 155-172.
Azumi, K. and McMillan, c J. (1975): Culture and organization structure: A comparison of Japanese and British organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 5(1): 35-47.
Bond, M. H. and Mai, K. P. (1989). Trusting to the Tao: Chínese valúes and the re-centering of psychology. Paper presented at the Con- ference on Moral Valúes and Moral Reasoning in Chínese Societies, Taipei, Taiwan.
Brossard, M. And Maurice, M. (1976). Is there a universal model of organization structure? International Studies of Management and Organization, 6(1): 11-45.
Bums, T. and Stalker, G. N. (1961): The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
Child, J. (1981): Culture, contingency and capitalism in the cross-national study of organizations. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Child, J. (1973): Strategies of control and organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18:1-17.
Child, J. (1972): Organizador» structure and strategies of control: A replicadon of the Aston study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 163-177.
Child, J. and Tayeb, Monir (1983): Theoredcal perspectives in cross-national organizational research. International Studies or Management and Organization, 12 (4): 23-70.
Clark, R. (1979). The Japanese company. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Clark, P. (1979). Cultural context as a determinant of organizational rationality: A comparison of the Tobacco industries in Britain and France. In C. J. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (Eds.), Organizations alike and unlike. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Clark, P. (1972). Organizational design: Theory and practice. London: Tavistock.
Cleeg, S. and Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, class and control London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Crozier, M. (1964): The bureaucratic phenomenon. London: Tavistock.
Daubigney, J. P. and Silvestre, J. J. (1972). Comparaison de la hierarchie des salaires entre rAllemagne et la France. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire d’economie et de sociologie du travail.
Dore, R. (1973). British factory-Japanese factory: The origins of national diversity in industrial relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P. and Bautista, J. A (1987). Dimensions of national culture and work related valúes: Hofstede revisited. Paper presented at the 1987 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1968): Some reflections on the variability of develop- ment and organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13:491-497.
Evan, William (1975): Measuring the impact of culture on organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 5 (1): 91-113.
Fayol, H. (1949). General industrial management London: Pitman.
Glaser, W. A. (1971): Cross-National comparisons of the factory. Journal of Comparative Administration, 3 (1): 83-117.
Goodstein, L. D. (1981). Commentary: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, Summer: 49-54.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Econoic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 9:481-510.
Hall, R. H. (1963). The concept of bureaucracy: An empirical assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 69:32-40.
Hamilton, G.G. and Biggart, N. W. (1988): Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. American Journal of Sociology, 94, Supplement, S52-S94.
Harbison, F. and Myers, C. A. (1959). Management in the industrial world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hickson, D. J. and McMillan, C. J. (1981): Organization and nation: The Aston programme IV. Westmead, England: Gower.
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., McMillan, C. J., and Schwitter, J. P. (1974): The culture-free context of organization structure: A tri-national comparison. Sociology, 8 (1): 59-80.
Hickson, D. J., McMillan, C. J., Azumi, K., and Horvath, D. (1979). Grounds for comparative organization theory: Quick sands or hard core. In C. J. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (Eds.), Organizations alike and unlike. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hofstede, G. (1980a): Culture’s consequences: International difierences in work-related valúes. Beverly-Hills: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1980b): Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad. Organizational Dynamics, Summer: 42-63.
Hofstede, G. and Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16 (4): 4-21.
Hunt, F. L. K. (1983). Applying American behavioral Science: Some cross-cultural problems. Organizational Dynamics, Summer: 55- 62.
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L. and Jackson, G. B. (1982): Meta-analysis: Cumulating research fíndings across studies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Inkson, J. H. K., Schwitter, J. P., Pheysey, D. C. and Hickson, D. J. (1970): A comparison or organization structure and managerial roles: Ohio, U. S. A, and the Midlands, England. Journal of Management Studies, 7(3): 347-363.
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. and Meyers, G A (1960). In- dustrialism and industrial man. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
Kessing, R. M. (1974). Tbeories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3: 73-97.
Kroeber, A L. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952): Culture: A critical review of concepts and defínitions. Cambridge, Mass: Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.
Lammers, C. J. and Hickson, D. J. (1979): Toward a comparative sociology of organizations. In C. J. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (Eds.), Organizations alike and unlike. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W. (1%7): Organization and environ- ment Boston: Harvard University.
Littler, C. R. (1982). The development of the labour process in capitalist societies. London: Heinemann.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achievement society. New York: The Free Press.
McMillan, C. J., Hickson, D. J., Hining, C. R., and Schneck, R. E. (1973). The structure of work organizations across societies. Academy of Management Journal, 16:555-569.
Maehr, M. L. (1974). Culture and acievement motivation. American Psychologist: 887-896.
Maehr, M. L. and Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross- cultural psychology, vol. 3. London: Academic Press.
Maurice, M. (1979). For a study of "the societal effect": Universality and specificity in organization research. In G J. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (Eds.), Organizations alike and unlike. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Maurice, M. (1976). Introduction: Theoretical and ideological aspects of the universalistic approach to the study of organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 6: 3-10.
Maurice, M., Sellier, F., and Silvestre, J. J. (1977). Production de la hierarchie dans l’enterprise. Recerche d’un effect societal. Aix-en- Provence: Laboratoire d’economie et de sociologie du travail.
Maurice, M., Sorge, A., and Warner, M. (1980). Social differences in organizing manufacturing units: A comparison of France, West Germany, and Great Britain. Organization Studies, 1:59-85.
Miller, G. A. (1987): Meta-analysis of the culture-ffee hypothesis. Organization Studies, 8 (4): 309-325.
Pugh, D. S. (1981). The Aston program perspective. The Aston program of research: Restrospect and prospect. In A Van de Ven and W. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J. Hinings, C. R. and Tumer, C. (1968): Dimensions of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarteriy, 13:65-105.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., and Hinings, C. R. (1969a). The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarteriy, 14:91- 114.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., and Hinings, C. R. (1969b). An empirical taxonomy of work organizations. Administrative Science Quartlery, 14:115-126.
Redding, S. G., and Pugh, D. S. (1986). The formal and the informal: Japanese and Chinese organization structures. In D. Clegg and S. G. Redding (Eds.), The enterprise and management in East Asia. Centre of Asían studies, Hong Kong University.
Roberts, K. H. (1970): On looking at an elephant: An evaluation of cross-cultural research related to organizations. Psychological Bul- letin, 74 (5): 327:50.
Roberts, K. H. and Boyacigiller, N. A (1984). Cross-national organiza- tional research: The grasp of the blinded men. Research in Or- ganizational Behavior, 6:423-475.
Robinson, R. (1983). Review of Culture’s Consequences. Work and Occupations, 10:110-115.
Sorge, A- (1983). Review of Culture’s consequence: International dif- ferences in work-related valúes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (4): 625-629.
Tayeb, M. (1987). Contingency theory and culture: A study of matched English and Indian manufacturing firms. Organization Studies, 8 (3): 241-261.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). Scientific management New York: Harper.
Triandis, H. C. (1982). Review of Culture’s Consequences: International differences in work-related valúes. Human Organization, 41: 86-90.
Udy, S. H. (1961) Technical and institutional factors in production organization. American Journal of Sociology. 67: 247-260.
Weber, R. A. (1977): Convergence or divergence? In T. D. Weinshall (ed.), Culture and Management Penguin Books.
Woodward, J. (1958): Management and Technology. Problems of progress. London: H. M. S. O.
Woodward, J. (1965): Industrial Organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.
Yehn, R. (1988a). A critical review of Hofstede’s valué framework. Eastern Academy of Management: Best Papers Proceedings 1988.
Yehn, R. (1988b). Valúes of American, Japanese and Taiwanese managers in Taiwan: A test of Hofctede’s framework. Academy of Management: Best Papers Proceedings 1988.
