Science, Technology, and Innovation policies in the integration process of Central America and the Dominican Republic: the role of representations and perceptions
| Issue | Vol. 47 Núm. 4 (2022): Ciencia y Sociedad |
| DOI | |
| Publicado | dic 10, 2022 |
|
Estadísticas |
Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC), Dominican Republic
Resumen
This paper summarizes the findings of a qualitative study about the role of the representations and perception of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies (STI) in the Central American integration process. It is based on interviews with policymakers and a parallel literature review process. The main finding points out the limitation of translating in practical terms the representations and perception of the positive role of STI policies in supporting the integration process and economic development at regional and national levels. An organic, long-term, and multiscale STI policy commitment is required to foster a more proactive and influential role of STI policy in the integration process and in supporting capacity building for innovation.
Alcorta, L., & Peres, W. (1998). Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 857-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00067-X
Alvarez, I., Natera, J. M., & Suarez, D. (2020). Science, technology and innovation policies looking backward, forwards and beyond: Developmental challenges and opportunities for Ibero-America in the era of COVID -19. Revista de Economía Mundial (REM). Journal of World Economy, (56), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i56.4862
Amorós, J. E., Poblete, C., & Mandakovic, V. (2019). R&D transfer, policy and innovative ambitious entrepreneurship: evidence from Latin American countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1396-1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09728-x
Barrientos Quiroga, P. A. (2010). Convergence patterns in Latin America. Economic Working Paper, Issue. School of Economics and Management.
Bonilla, K., & Serafim, M. (2021). Relevance of Science, Technology and Innovation Diplomacy for STI Capacity Building in Central America: The Cases of Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. In L. A. Orozco, G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, J. H. Sierra-González, J. García-Estévez, & I. Bortagaray (Eds.), Science, Technology, and Higher Education: Governance Approaches on Social Inclusion and Sustainability in Latin America (pp. 21-53). Springer International Publishing.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, (80), 1513-1522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
Bouroncle, C., Imbach, P., Rodríguez-Sánchez, B., Medellín, C., Martinez-Valle, A., & Läderach, P. (2017). Mapping climate change adaptive capacity and vulnerability of smallholder agricultural livelihoods in Central America: ranking and descriptive approaches to support adaptation strategies. Climatic Change, 141(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1792-0
Casalet, M., & Buenrostro, E. (2014). Central American regional integration in science, technology and innovation: a new challenge International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 24(2), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.933018
Cassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. M. M. (2000). Local Systems of Innovation in Mercosur Countries. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670250
CEPAL. (2021). La paradoja de la recuperación en América Latina y el Caribe. Crecimiento con persistentes problemas estructurales: desigualdad, pobreza, poca inversión y baja productividad”, Informe Especial. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/47043/S2100379_es.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y
CEPAL. (2022). Panorama Social de América Latina, 2021. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/47718/1/S2100655_es.pdf
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2, 347-365.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2018). Thinking About Data With Grounded Theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 743-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809455
Cimoli, M., Ferraz, J. C. & Primi, A. (2009). Science, technology and innovation policies in open global economies: reflections from Latin America and the Caribbean. Gcg Georgetown University – Universia, 3(1), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.3232/GCG.2009.V3.N1.02
Cimoli, M., Ferraz, J. C., & Primi, A. (2005). Science and technology policies in open economies: the case of Latin America and the Caribbean. In CEPALl (Ed.), (Vol. CEPAL-ECLAC-GTZ). CEPAL-ECLAC-GTZ. http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/4560/1/S05821_en.pdf
Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos (International Review for Social Science), 47(1), 3-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
Dutrénit, G., & Puchet, M. (2017). Chapter 7: Tensions of science, technology and innovation policy in Mexico: analytical models, institutional evolution, national capabilities and governance. Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. In Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dutrénit, G., & Puchet, M. (2017). Tensions of science, technology and innovation policy in Mexico: analytical models, institutional evolution, national capabilities and governance. In S. Khulmann & G. Ordóñez-Matamoros (Eds.), Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. Toward Better Models (pp. 205-231): Edward Elgar Publishing
Espinal, R. (2001). La sociedad civil movilizada y las reformas democráticas en la República Dominicana. Espiral. Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad, vii(21), 101-132.
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies- The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, (38), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006
Fariza, I. (Febrero 7, 2020). América Latina ha perdido el tren de la política industrial y la innovación, Entrevista. El País. https://elpais.com/economia/2020/02/05/actualidad/1580921046_527634.html?prm=enviar_email
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2010). The ‘policy mix’ for innovation: Rethinking innovation policy in a multilevel, multi-actor context. Manchester Business School Working Paper Issue. T. U. o. M. Manchester Business School.
Gómez-Valenzuela, V. (2016). Policy models and rationales of science, technology and innovation in Central America: an alternative look to the integration process. Paper presented at the EU-SPRI Conference Lund 2016, Lund, Sweden.
Gómez-Valenzuela, V. (2020). STI policies in the Dominican Republic: the influence of economic rationales from a context-development perspective. Science and Public Policy, 47(3), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa019
Gómez-Valenzuela, V., Rosa, H., & Tejeda, A. S. (2020). Policy mix to foster innovation in the Dominican Republic: attempts from an empirical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1739640
Grazzi, M., Pietrobelli, C., & Szirmai, A. (2016). Innovation and Productivity in Latin American and Caribbean Firms: Conclusions. In M. Grazzi & C. Pietrobelli (Eds.), Firm Innovation and Productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 317-324). Palgrave Macmillan.
Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2003). R&D and absorptive capacity: from theory to data. IFS. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3907/1/3907.pdf
Hsiang, S. M. (2010). Temperatures and cyclones are strongly associated with economic production in the Caribbean and Central America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(35), 15367-15372. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.1009510107
Inekwe, J. N. (2015). The Contribution of R&D Expenditure to Economic Growth in Developing Economies. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0807-3
Intrakumnerdi, P., & Chaminade, C. (2007). Innovation system policies in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Working Paper, Issue. R. a. C. i. t. L. E. Centre for Innovation.
Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787-801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032
Kincaid, A. D., & Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2001). Centro América 2020: hacia un nuevo modelo de desarrollo regional: FLACSO (Facultad Latino Americana de Ciencias Sociales).
Krishna, V. V. (2013). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: High on Goals, Low on Commitment. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(16), 15-19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23527253
Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P., & Smits, R. (2010). Introduction. A systemic perspective: the innovation policy dance. The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook, 1-22.
Lanahan, L., & Feldman, M. (2015). Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy, (44), 1387-1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.002
Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multilevel setting. Research Policy, 37(5), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
Lawrence, J., & Tar, U. (2013). The use of the grounded theory technique as a practical tool for qualitative data collection and analysis. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 11(1), 29-40.
Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2014). Coordination-mix: the hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12090
Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, (42), 1647-1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005
Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2019). Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies. Research Policy, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, (41), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
Mathieu, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Heffner, T. S., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación, MICIT. (2011). Plan Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2011-2014. https://www.clubdeinvestigacion.com/micit-presenta-plan-nacional-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-2011-2014/
Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00140-8
North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359-368.
OEI. (2014). Políticas de CTI. Sistemas Institucionales. Organización de Estados Ibero Americanos & RICYT. http://www.politicascti.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=49&lang=es
Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Bortagaray, I., Sierra-González, J. H., García-Estévez, J., & Orozco, L. A. (2021). Policy and Governance of Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable and Inclusive Development in Latin America. In G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, L. A. Orozco, J. H. Sierra-González, I. Bortagaray, & J. García-Estévez (Eds.), Policy and Governance of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development in Latin América (pp. 1-11). Springer International Publishing.
Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Centeno, J. P., Andrade-Sastoque, E., & Pinzón-Camargo, M. A. (2021). Transformative Innovation Policy in Emerging Economies: What Does It Entail? In G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, L. A. Orozco, J. H. Sierra-González, I. Bortagaray, & J. García-Estévez (Eds.), Policy and Governance of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development in Latin América (pp. 105-146). Springer International Publishing.
Padilla-Pérez, R., & Gaudin, Y. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy (43), 749-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.011
Perrotta, D. (2016). Chapter 11: MERCOSUR, regulatory regionalism and contesting projects of higher education governance. Global Regionalisms and Higher Education: Edward Elgar Publishing.
PNUD. (2013). Informe Regional de Desarrollo Humano 2013-2014. Seguridad Ciudadana con Rostro Humano: diagnóstico y propuesta para América Latina. C. R. d. S. p. A. L. y. e. C. P. d. l. N. U. p. e. Desarrollo.
Richardson, G. P., Andersen, D. F., Maxwell, T. A., & Stewart, T. R. (1994). Foundations of mental model research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1994 International System Dynamics Conference.
RIGYT. (2014). El estado de la ciencia 2014. http://www.ricyt.org/publicaciones
SELECT. (2008). Plan Decenal de Educación Superior 2008-2018. http://mescyt.gob.do/transparencia/index.php/plan-estrategico-de-la-institucion/planificacion-estrategica?download=110:plan-decenal-en-resumen
SENACYT. (2010). Plan Estratético Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
Švarc, J., & Dabić, M. (2021). Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries. Technology in Society, 67, 101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101705
Thomson, S. B. (2010). Sample size and grounded theory. Journal of Administration and Governance, 5(1), 45-52. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3037218
Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Ulnicane, I. (2015). Broadening Aims and Building Support in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: The Case of the European Research Area. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 11(1), 31-49. https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/631/510
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010). Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
Viales-Hurtado, R. J., Sáenz-Leandro, R., & Garita-Mondragón, M. (2021). The problem of scientific policies in Central America (1980-2020): the tension between innovation and social cohesion in a global context. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 1876314. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1876314
Villa, E., Cardona Valencia, D., Valencia-Arias, A., Hormechea, K., & García, J. (2020). Transformative Innovation Policy, SDGs, and the Colombian University. In G. Nhamo & V. Mjimba (Eds.), Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education (pp. 169-183). Springer International Publishing.
Vītola, A. (2014). Innovation policy mix in a multilevel context: The case of the Baltic Sea Region countries. Science and Public Policy, 42(3), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu059
Vonortas, N. (2002). Building competitive firms: technology policy initiatives in Latin America. Technology in Society, 24(4), 433-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00034-9
WIPO. (2021). The Global Innovation Index 2021. Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing the literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
World Bank. (2022). World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#
Alvarez, I., Natera, J. M., & Suarez, D. (2020). Science, technology and innovation policies looking backward, forwards and beyond: Developmental challenges and opportunities for Ibero-America in the era of COVID -19. Revista de Economía Mundial (REM). Journal of World Economy, (56), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i56.4862
Amorós, J. E., Poblete, C., & Mandakovic, V. (2019). R&D transfer, policy and innovative ambitious entrepreneurship: evidence from Latin American countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1396-1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09728-x
Barrientos Quiroga, P. A. (2010). Convergence patterns in Latin America. Economic Working Paper, Issue. School of Economics and Management.
Bonilla, K., & Serafim, M. (2021). Relevance of Science, Technology and Innovation Diplomacy for STI Capacity Building in Central America: The Cases of Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. In L. A. Orozco, G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, J. H. Sierra-González, J. García-Estévez, & I. Bortagaray (Eds.), Science, Technology, and Higher Education: Governance Approaches on Social Inclusion and Sustainability in Latin America (pp. 21-53). Springer International Publishing.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, (80), 1513-1522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
Bouroncle, C., Imbach, P., Rodríguez-Sánchez, B., Medellín, C., Martinez-Valle, A., & Läderach, P. (2017). Mapping climate change adaptive capacity and vulnerability of smallholder agricultural livelihoods in Central America: ranking and descriptive approaches to support adaptation strategies. Climatic Change, 141(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1792-0
Casalet, M., & Buenrostro, E. (2014). Central American regional integration in science, technology and innovation: a new challenge International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 24(2), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.933018
Cassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. M. M. (2000). Local Systems of Innovation in Mercosur Countries. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670250
CEPAL. (2021). La paradoja de la recuperación en América Latina y el Caribe. Crecimiento con persistentes problemas estructurales: desigualdad, pobreza, poca inversión y baja productividad”, Informe Especial. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/47043/S2100379_es.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y
CEPAL. (2022). Panorama Social de América Latina, 2021. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/47718/1/S2100655_es.pdf
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2, 347-365.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2018). Thinking About Data With Grounded Theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 743-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809455
Cimoli, M., Ferraz, J. C. & Primi, A. (2009). Science, technology and innovation policies in open global economies: reflections from Latin America and the Caribbean. Gcg Georgetown University – Universia, 3(1), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.3232/GCG.2009.V3.N1.02
Cimoli, M., Ferraz, J. C., & Primi, A. (2005). Science and technology policies in open economies: the case of Latin America and the Caribbean. In CEPALl (Ed.), (Vol. CEPAL-ECLAC-GTZ). CEPAL-ECLAC-GTZ. http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/4560/1/S05821_en.pdf
Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos (International Review for Social Science), 47(1), 3-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
Dutrénit, G., & Puchet, M. (2017). Chapter 7: Tensions of science, technology and innovation policy in Mexico: analytical models, institutional evolution, national capabilities and governance. Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. In Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dutrénit, G., & Puchet, M. (2017). Tensions of science, technology and innovation policy in Mexico: analytical models, institutional evolution, national capabilities and governance. In S. Khulmann & G. Ordóñez-Matamoros (Eds.), Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. Toward Better Models (pp. 205-231): Edward Elgar Publishing
Espinal, R. (2001). La sociedad civil movilizada y las reformas democráticas en la República Dominicana. Espiral. Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad, vii(21), 101-132.
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies- The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, (38), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006
Fariza, I. (Febrero 7, 2020). América Latina ha perdido el tren de la política industrial y la innovación, Entrevista. El País. https://elpais.com/economia/2020/02/05/actualidad/1580921046_527634.html?prm=enviar_email
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2010). The ‘policy mix’ for innovation: Rethinking innovation policy in a multilevel, multi-actor context. Manchester Business School Working Paper Issue. T. U. o. M. Manchester Business School.
Gómez-Valenzuela, V. (2016). Policy models and rationales of science, technology and innovation in Central America: an alternative look to the integration process. Paper presented at the EU-SPRI Conference Lund 2016, Lund, Sweden.
Gómez-Valenzuela, V. (2020). STI policies in the Dominican Republic: the influence of economic rationales from a context-development perspective. Science and Public Policy, 47(3), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa019
Gómez-Valenzuela, V., Rosa, H., & Tejeda, A. S. (2020). Policy mix to foster innovation in the Dominican Republic: attempts from an empirical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1739640
Grazzi, M., Pietrobelli, C., & Szirmai, A. (2016). Innovation and Productivity in Latin American and Caribbean Firms: Conclusions. In M. Grazzi & C. Pietrobelli (Eds.), Firm Innovation and Productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 317-324). Palgrave Macmillan.
Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2003). R&D and absorptive capacity: from theory to data. IFS. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3907/1/3907.pdf
Hsiang, S. M. (2010). Temperatures and cyclones are strongly associated with economic production in the Caribbean and Central America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(35), 15367-15372. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.1009510107
Inekwe, J. N. (2015). The Contribution of R&D Expenditure to Economic Growth in Developing Economies. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0807-3
Intrakumnerdi, P., & Chaminade, C. (2007). Innovation system policies in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Working Paper, Issue. R. a. C. i. t. L. E. Centre for Innovation.
Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787-801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032
Kincaid, A. D., & Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2001). Centro América 2020: hacia un nuevo modelo de desarrollo regional: FLACSO (Facultad Latino Americana de Ciencias Sociales).
Krishna, V. V. (2013). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: High on Goals, Low on Commitment. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(16), 15-19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23527253
Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P., & Smits, R. (2010). Introduction. A systemic perspective: the innovation policy dance. The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook, 1-22.
Lanahan, L., & Feldman, M. (2015). Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy, (44), 1387-1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.002
Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multilevel setting. Research Policy, 37(5), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
Lawrence, J., & Tar, U. (2013). The use of the grounded theory technique as a practical tool for qualitative data collection and analysis. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 11(1), 29-40.
Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2014). Coordination-mix: the hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12090
Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, (42), 1647-1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005
Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2019). Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies. Research Policy, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, (41), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
Mathieu, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Heffner, T. S., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación, MICIT. (2011). Plan Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2011-2014. https://www.clubdeinvestigacion.com/micit-presenta-plan-nacional-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-2011-2014/
Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00140-8
North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359-368.
OEI. (2014). Políticas de CTI. Sistemas Institucionales. Organización de Estados Ibero Americanos & RICYT. http://www.politicascti.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=49&lang=es
Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Bortagaray, I., Sierra-González, J. H., García-Estévez, J., & Orozco, L. A. (2021). Policy and Governance of Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable and Inclusive Development in Latin America. In G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, L. A. Orozco, J. H. Sierra-González, I. Bortagaray, & J. García-Estévez (Eds.), Policy and Governance of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development in Latin América (pp. 1-11). Springer International Publishing.
Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Centeno, J. P., Andrade-Sastoque, E., & Pinzón-Camargo, M. A. (2021). Transformative Innovation Policy in Emerging Economies: What Does It Entail? In G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, L. A. Orozco, J. H. Sierra-González, I. Bortagaray, & J. García-Estévez (Eds.), Policy and Governance of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development in Latin América (pp. 105-146). Springer International Publishing.
Padilla-Pérez, R., & Gaudin, Y. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy (43), 749-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.011
Perrotta, D. (2016). Chapter 11: MERCOSUR, regulatory regionalism and contesting projects of higher education governance. Global Regionalisms and Higher Education: Edward Elgar Publishing.
PNUD. (2013). Informe Regional de Desarrollo Humano 2013-2014. Seguridad Ciudadana con Rostro Humano: diagnóstico y propuesta para América Latina. C. R. d. S. p. A. L. y. e. C. P. d. l. N. U. p. e. Desarrollo.
Richardson, G. P., Andersen, D. F., Maxwell, T. A., & Stewart, T. R. (1994). Foundations of mental model research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1994 International System Dynamics Conference.
RIGYT. (2014). El estado de la ciencia 2014. http://www.ricyt.org/publicaciones
SELECT. (2008). Plan Decenal de Educación Superior 2008-2018. http://mescyt.gob.do/transparencia/index.php/plan-estrategico-de-la-institucion/planificacion-estrategica?download=110:plan-decenal-en-resumen
SENACYT. (2010). Plan Estratético Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
Švarc, J., & Dabić, M. (2021). Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries. Technology in Society, 67, 101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101705
Thomson, S. B. (2010). Sample size and grounded theory. Journal of Administration and Governance, 5(1), 45-52. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3037218
Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Ulnicane, I. (2015). Broadening Aims and Building Support in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: The Case of the European Research Area. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 11(1), 31-49. https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/631/510
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010). Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
Viales-Hurtado, R. J., Sáenz-Leandro, R., & Garita-Mondragón, M. (2021). The problem of scientific policies in Central America (1980-2020): the tension between innovation and social cohesion in a global context. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 1876314. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1876314
Villa, E., Cardona Valencia, D., Valencia-Arias, A., Hormechea, K., & García, J. (2020). Transformative Innovation Policy, SDGs, and the Colombian University. In G. Nhamo & V. Mjimba (Eds.), Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education (pp. 169-183). Springer International Publishing.
Vītola, A. (2014). Innovation policy mix in a multilevel context: The case of the Baltic Sea Region countries. Science and Public Policy, 42(3), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu059
Vonortas, N. (2002). Building competitive firms: technology policy initiatives in Latin America. Technology in Society, 24(4), 433-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00034-9
WIPO. (2021). The Global Innovation Index 2021. Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing the literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
World Bank. (2022). World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#
integration
STI policy
mental models
STI representations
Central America
Dominican Republic
- Resumen visto - 301 veces
- PDF descargado - 159 veces
- HTML descargado - 38 veces
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Copyright
© Science and Society, 2022
Afiliaciones
Víctor Gómez-Valenzuela
Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC), Dominican Republic
Cómo citar
Gómez-Valenzuela, V. (2022). Science, Technology, and Innovation policies in the integration process of Central America and the Dominican Republic: the role of representations and perceptions . Ciencia Y Sociedad, 47(4), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2022.v47i4.pp9-33